The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria has launched a blistering attack on former Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, describing his tenure as marked by “brazen lawlessness” and “gross abuse of office.”
The rights group was reacting to Malami’s recent claim that he has no regrets over his actions while serving under former President Muhammadu Buhari, insisting that his time in office represented one of the lowest points for respect of the rule of law in Nigeria.
In a strongly worded statement signed by its National Coordinator, Emmanuel Onwubiko, HURIWA accused Malami of backing actions that undermined the judiciary, including the controversial removal of former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Walter Onnoghen.
The group alleged that the suspension of Onnoghen in 2019 was politically motivated and carried out with the support of the then Justice Minister.
HURIWA also referenced the 2016 raids on the homes of senior judges by operatives of the Department of State Services, describing the operations as unlawful and unconstitutional, and alleging that they were carried out with Malami’s approval.
The organisation further criticised Malami’s role in the arrest and rendition of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, from Nairobi to Nigeria.
According to HURIWA, the handling of the case contributed to unrest in the South-East and reflected a disregard for constitutional rights and international legal standards.
The group claimed that such actions led to widespread civil tension and enforcement crackdowns in the region.
HURIWA also accused Malami of failing to prosecute alleged sponsors of terrorism during his tenure, despite reports of arrests and prosecutions of suspects linked to terror financing in the United Arab Emirates.
Reacting to Malami’s insistence that he has no regrets, HURIWA said the statement was shocking given what it described as years of human rights violations under his watch.
The group argued that the former minister’s current legal challenges, including charges filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, reflect the consequences of past actions.
Malami is currently facing a 16-count charge bordering on alleged financial crimes alongside members of his family. He has pleaded not guilty and maintains that he will defend himself in court.
Despite alleging that his own rights were violated during investigations, HURIWA dismissed his claims, stating that his tenure was characterised by disregard for due process and civil liberties.
The rights group concluded by urging Nigerians to reflect on the implications of Malami’s tenure, stressing the need for accountability, adherence to the rule of law, and protection of fundamental human rights.
The statement adds to growing public debate over governance, justice, and the legacy of past public officials in Nigeria.